FREE CONSULTATION: (540) 585-1776

Sale of Business Agreement’s Non-Compete Upheld by Virginia Supreme Court

Sale of Business Agreement’s Non-Compete Upheld by Virginia Supreme Court

In Parr v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., 268 Va. 461 (2004), a family sold its funeral home business to a holding company. The holding company signed a lease for the funeral home property; and, the family signed a non-compete that prohibited them from opening a competing funeral home after the sale of the business.

After the sale closed, the holding company began making regular lease payments. Several years into the lease, the holding company went bankrupt and stopped payments. The family terminated the lease and began opened a competing funeral home on the property.

The holding company sued to enforce the non-compete, even though it had defaulted on the lease. When a party is the first to breach a contract, can they still enforce a non-compete?

If a Party Commits “First Breach”, the Non-Compete is Invalid

When a party defaults on a contract, it cannot thereafter sue to enforce a non-compete. The non-compete is null and void.

This rule is called the “first breach” doctrine: under Virginia law, a party cannot sue to enforce a non-compete contract when they have first breached a material term of the contract.

A common example is failure to pay past-due wages. If an employer fails to pay its employee past-due compensation, the employer cannot then sue to enforce a non-compete.

In this case, the Virginia Supreme Court held that the Lease Agreement and the Non-Compete Agreement were integrated contracts. Therefore, when the holding company breached the terms of the lease, it could not enforce the non-compete against the family.

Sale of Business Non-Compete More Broadly Construed

Had the holding company not committed first breach, it may have been entitled to enforce the non-compete.

The court was silent on whether the non-compete’s terms were otherwise reasonable. Under Virginia law, a non-compete must be reasonably limited in duration, function, and geographic scope.

Here, the duration (10 years) would be overbroad for an employee. But it would probably be reasonable in the context of the sale of a business, e.g. an asset purchase agreement, a 10-year non-compete is generally held to be reasonable given the relative sophistication of the parties to the contract.


Need a referral? For information about finding a deportation lawyer in Virginia, an immigration lawyer in Roanoke, Virginia, or an attorney to handle any other matter, contact the Virginia State Bar Lawyer Referral Service.

Menu Title